China’s internet, fortified by its “Great Firewall,” blocks the platforms through which much of the world consumes culture — YouTube, Netflix, Facebook, Instagram.
Yet Korean dramas, music, and entertainment continue to find audiences there, slipping through the cracks via VPNs, unofficial downloads, and fan-run networks. This quiet persistence offers a window into China’s cultural ecosystem, and into the limits of state control.
Korean pop culture first surged in China in the early 2000s with dramas like "What Is Love" and "Jewel in the Palace." The last Korean drama to be officially imported was "My Love From the Star" in 2013–14. Since then, political tensions, ideological anxieties, and industrial considerations have sharply narrowed the pipeline.
Chinese authorities have long viewed Korean content as a challenge to the nation’s values, wary that its themes — individualism, personal freedom, the primacy of romance — might stir impulses at odds with collectivist and family-centered ideals.
Cultural security also looms large: foreign entertainment is seen as a possible catalyst for political awakening among young people. And at its peak, the Korean Wave grew so dominant that it threatened the ambitions of China’s own cultural industry, which seeks to knit its immense domestic market into a unified cultural sphere.
These concerns hardened into practice around the time of the THAAD dispute, when an unofficial but far-reaching set of restrictions took hold. He Tianxiang, a professor at City University of Hong Kong, calls this era the “Big Ban.” Beijing never declared a formal prohibition, but Korean dramas and TV formats were suddenly delayed, sidelined, or quietly scrubbed from programming slates. Casting decisions shifted. Public events evaporated.
And yet the audience never went away. Instead, it rerouted. British researcher Polly White describes this phenomenon as “shadow circulation” — a parallel distribution system created not by corporations but by fans. What China blocked, its young people reconstructed: subtitling communities, file-sharing rings, encrypted chat groups, and stealth fan clubs.
Offline, the appetite was just as visible. Pop-up stores selling Korean idol merchandise drew long lines in major cities. Fan meetings sold out instantly. The more official access contracted, the more sophisticated these informal networks became. In effect, China’s youth built a transnational cultural infrastructure of their own.
Of course, unauthorized downloads and piracy can’t be defended. But they cannot be separated from the structural conditions that produced them. When entire channels are sealed off, audiences find unregulated ones. For the Korean industry, the costs have been substantial: losing what was once its largest overseas market reshaped revenue streams and creative strategies.
Still, the endurance of this cultural flow matters. Even when diplomacy froze and formal exchanges collapsed, fans maintained contact, translating, sharing, and circulating content that policymakers sought to contain. Culture, stubborn as water, found a way around the barriers.
The task now is to bring this circulation out of the shadows. Reopening official distribution routes would reduce economic losses, tamp down illicit markets, and allow both countries to rebuild cultural ties on more stable ground. The informal bridges that young people have maintained — fragile, improvised, often invisible — may yet become the basis for a renewed relationship.
Culture has always moved more freely than politics. In China, despite the firewalls and silences, it still does.
* This article, published by Aju Business Daily, was translated by AI and edited by AJP.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Business Daily 무단 전재 및 재배포 금지
본 콘텐츠는 뉴스픽 파트너스에서 공유된 콘텐츠입니다.
